How Accurate is Your Memory on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

 

By Patricia L Johnson

“The repetition of tentative news stories, even if they are subsequently disconfirmed, can assist in the creation of false memories in a substantial proportion of people.”

The above is a quote taken from the Psychological Science research study of March 2005 [1] “Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation” Vol. 16, No. 3.

The study also determined “Once information is published, its subsequent correction does not alter people’s beliefs unless they are suspicious about the motives underlying the events the news stories are about.”

This study confirmed what the majority of US voters have hopefully been able to determine on their own which is the more we hear something on the news, the more likely we are to believe the statement is true, whether what we are hearing is fact or fiction.

Such is the case with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Over and over again the public was advised by President Bush and V.P. Cheney that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction that could be used against the United States and the only way to eliminate the threat was for the U.S. to destroy the WMD’s.

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence released their bipartisan report titled POSTWAR FINDINGS ABOUT IRAQ’S WMD PROGRAMS AND LINKS TO TERRORISM AND HOW THEY COMPARE WITH PREPWAR ASSESSMENTS” on September 8, 2006.

This report was prepared by the 109th Congress, when Republicans held the majority in both the House and the Senate.

The SSCI committee members consisted of the following (8) Republicans – Pat Roberts, Chairman, Orrin Hatch, Mike DeWine, Christopher Bond, Trent Lott, Olympia Snowe, Chuck Hagel and Chambliss Saxby and (7) Democrats – John Rockefeller, Vice Chairman, Carl Levin, Dianne Feinstein, Ron Wyden, Evan Bayh, Barbara Mikulski and Russ Feingold, along with three ex offico’s; Bill Frist, Harry Reid, and John Warner. Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, as well as the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Armed Services Committee serve as ex officio SSCI members.

The report listed the following conclusions on Iraq WMD’s:

Conclusion 1: Postwar findings do not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) judgment that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program. Information obtained after the war supports the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research’s (INR) assessment in the NIE that the Intelligence Community lacked persuasive evidence that Baghdad had launched a coherent effort to reconstitute its nuclear weapons program.

Conclusion 2: Postwar findings do not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessment that Iraq’s acquisition of high-strength aluminum tubes was intended for an Iraqi nuclear program. The findings do support the asssessments in the NIE of the Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) that the aluminum tubes were likely intended for a conventional rocket program.

Conclusion 3: Postwar findings to not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessment that Iraq was “vigorously trying to procure uranium ore and yellowcake” from Africa. Postwar findings support the assessment in the NIE of the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) that claims of Iraqi pursuit of natural uranium in Africa are “highly dubious.”

Conclusion 4: Postwar findings do not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessment that “Iraq has biological weapons” and that “all key aspects of Iraq’s offensive biological weapons (BW) program are larger and more advanced than before the Gulf war.”

Conclusion 5: Postwar findings do not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessment that Iraq possessed, or ever developed, mobile facilities for producing biological warfare (BW) agents.

Conclusion 6: Concerns existed within the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIUA) Directorate of Operations (DO) prior to the war about the credibility of the mobile biological weapons program source code-named CURVE BALL. The concerns were based, in part, on doubts raised by the foreign intelligence service that handled CURVE BALL and a third service. The Committee has no information that these concerns were conveyed to policymakers, including members of the U.S. Congress, prior to the war. The Committee is continuing to investigate issues regarding prewar concerns about CURVE BALL’S credibility.

Conclusion 7: Postwar findings do not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessments that Iraq “has chemical weapons” or “is expanding its chemical industry to support chemical weapons (CW) production.”

Conclusion 8: Postwar findings support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessment that Iraq had missiles which exceeded United Nation (UN) range limits. The findings do not support the assessment that Iraq likely retained a covert force of SCUD variant short range ballistic missiles (SRBMs).

Conclusion 9: Postwar findings do not support the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) assessments that Iraq had a developmental program for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) “probably intended to deliver biological agents” or that an effort to procure U.S. mapping software “strongly suggests that Iraq is investing the use of these UAV’s for missions targeting the United States.” Postwar findings support the view of the Air Force, joined by DIA and the Army, in an NIE published in January 2003 that Iraq’s UAV’s were primarily intended for reconnaissance.

Information on threats to the United States is now provided to our leaders by one or more of the following agencies within the Intelligence Community:

  • Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • National Security Agency (NSA)
  • Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
  • National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)
  • National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)

In addition, the DOS, DOD, DOJ, FBI, DEA, DHS, DOT, DOE and all branches of the military contribute information on intelligence.

The rush to judgment on Iraq has cost this country dearly. Thousands of U.S. troops lost their lives fighting in Iraq [4,423], while tens of thousands were wounded [31,942]. Spouses and children were left to fend on their own while our troops went charging off into the sunset to attack a country that we had no business being in, much less attacking. Billions of dollars [$616 billion through June of 2008] of our tax dollars have been spent on military actions in Iraq that could and should have been spent in this country updating our crumbling infrastructure.

CRS prepared a report in June of 2008 indicating current year costs (constant dollars would be obviously considerably higher) on the following:

A cursory review will indicate that as of June 2008 we had already spent in Iraq, more than what the other five conflicts cost combined.

Many other countries around the world assisted us in our fight against WMD’s and hundreds of their troops were killed and/or wounded as well. If you add the hundreds of thousands of civilians that were killed and/or maimed in Iraq and the losses that country took at our hands, the numbers are astronomical.

Was it worth it?

© 2014 Patricia L Johnson

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Iraq, War, National Intelligence, News and politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to How Accurate is Your Memory on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction

  1. Donnie says:

    I could not refrain from commenting. Exceptionally
    well written!

  2. This blog was… hoow doo I say it? Relevant!!

    Finally I have found something which helped me.
    Kudos!

  3. I haven’t watched the movie yet ! Rather I think reading the comment threads at Washington Monthly’s Political Animal when Kevin Drum was moderating gave me a singular viewpoint. He moved to Mother Jones.
    The lies are from Foggy Bottom and Rand more than the President. http://www.transcend.org/tms/2010/05/the-npt-and-the-nuclear-power-trap/ Also check CASMII. Dr. Ahmadinejad had to be portrayed as a clown. After western ‘diplomats’ boycotted his speeches at the UN the rest would give him a standing ovation ! One reason why came to light when I chased down allegations of Holocaust Denier by watching a number of interviews on YouTube…which all ran from the same prepared script. He said Israel denied any lesson of the Holocaust by its treatment of Palestinians. And that Israel was not synonymous with Jewry. There is a stable Jewish population in Iran not inclined to claim ‘Right of Return.’ Iran is historically a refuge for them.
    I got naughty. http://my.opera.com/oldephartte/blog/2013/03/24/denier

  4. Administrator says:

    John,

    Thank you for your comment. I basically wrote this article as a response to an ongoing discussion I was having with another author on the following article:

    http://www.thesimplekeys.org/2014/01/13/our-free-press-is-costing-you-plenty/

    The Simple Keys is a relatively new blog. I don’t believe I’ve ever read anything on http://www.leadingtowar.com so I’ll be sure to take a look at the material. Thank you for including the URL.

    Pat Johnson

  5. It isn’t as if any of this was a mystery : from the possible ‘blowing’ of a CIA NOC in charge of the nuclear threat desk for the middle east per Scooter Libby ( Valerie Plame {Wilson}) and the destruction of the Brewster Jennings intelligence network ; concurrent with Addington’s false intel ( also out of Cheney’s office ) when the NIE of 16 US intel agencies was negative on Iraq WMD to the sideshow of Joe Wilson’s expedition to Nigeria on a wild goose chase about putative yellowcake purchases ( Iraq was littered with the stuff. The aluminum tubes were used for making fertilizer from it as per the Arms Control Wonk . ) The lies led to debunking of the Downing Street Papers in the UK and subsequent blogging which became Antiwar. Even the war game was kept from the public. Known as ‘the Bible for Iraq’ the war game was filed as a NSA secret even though it was a military study – Post Saddam Iraq : Desert Crossing. The Panelist laid it out in an unlikely post : The Real Winner in Iraq was Monsanto. And tortured innocents railroaded into Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and Baghram were drugged and conditioned to become patsies of the CIA….al CIA da. ( Even Hillary said al Qaeda was a farce )
    But it was Step One in destabilizing the region.
    http://www.leadingtowar.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s